Dissecting the Croak, Part I

One day this frog was bored, so he decided to call the psychic hotline.The psychic asked the frog, "what do you want to know." "Tell me something about my love life," said the frog. "In the very near future you are going to meet a very beautiful young woman," said the psychic.  "Cool, where? at a disco or a party?" said the frog."No," the psychic replied,"next month in her biology class!"

"Analyzing humor is like dissecting a frog. Few people are interested and the frog dies of it."  - E.B. White

"Almost all the jokes that I have found touch on a certain social boundary, susceptibility or 'threshold of embarrassment.'  The most popular joke categories deal with sensitive questions like sex, gender relationships, foreigners, aggression, religion, money, sicknesses, death, disasters and scandals.  Much of the pleasure of humor lies in the short-lived, playful, light-hearted overstepping of a social boundary." 

"...the most widespread jokes are without a doubt jokes about sex and gender relationships..."

"...I can easily distinguish elements crucial to the understanding of all categories of jokes:  the distinction between jokes in which a boundary is transgressed and jokes that themselves transgress a social boundary."  - from "Good humor, bad taste: a sociology of the joke" by Giselinde Kuipers

"Joking entails a dynamic process where the characteristics of the joke teller and the audience interact with the embedded meaning of the joke.  It is the interactions among these factors that determine whether efforts to be funny are acceptable or not."

"Freud argues for the cathartic effect of joking, especially in areas of unconscious turmoil about human sexuality and aggression.  Humour is seen as a safe outlet that prevents the teller from expressing his hostilities in more destructive ways." - from "No Laughing Matter: Boundaries of Gender-Based Humour in the Classroom" by Aysan Sev'er and Sheldon Ungar

"We know that when we verbally depreciate the humanity of people it is much easier to treat them in inhumane ways."  - from "An Anatomy of Humor" by Arthur Asa Berger

Boundary-pushing jokes and sacred cows.
Do sacred cows make the best hamburger?
Is it so wrong it's right?
Do you sometimes laugh against your better judgment?
How do you maintain the balance between funny and offensive?
How far is too far?  When and how does a joke become a boundary transgression?
Bad taste or much needed levity?
Where's the line, how is it determined, how do you know it, who sets it, why and who polices it?
Are older people more easily offended than younger people?  Are women more easily offended than men?  Are Americans more easily offended than Europeans?  And if so, why?  And does it matter?
Do jokes based on tropes of discrimination and bigotry like race, gender and sexual orientation let the hot air out of the balloon and tweak the destructive accepted conventional wisdom of the time and place or only add to the destructiveness and propagate hate and ignorance?  Do ethnic jokes, for example, "reinforce stereotypes and hostile feelings" or do they help people "deal with hostility verbally instead of physically"?
Is "politically correct" a worthy and achievable ideal?  Useless or overused?
Are some of our greatest modern social commentators and philosophers comedians?
Do people just need to lighten the fuck up?


Links:
http://www.froggyville.com/jokes.htm
http://www.bookbrowse.com/quotes/detail/index.cfm?quote_number=228
http://books.google.com/books?id=uk_WHTCTN9YC&pg=PA121&lpg=PA121&dq=boundaries+of+humor+and+jokes&source=bl&ots=uDr0R__FjJ&sig=Ifxovpm2HrShoakZxnXI7i3mLTA&h
http://www.jstor.org/pss/2959937
http://books.google.co.in/books?id=aZkRJJnc6BUC&pg=PA57&dq=Davies,+Christie.+Ethnic+Humor&source=gbs_toc_r&cad=0_0#v=onepage&q=Davies%2C%20Christie.%20Ethnic%20Humor&f=false

Yale Frat Pledges' Rape Chants & Yale Suspends Frat for Sexism

October 2010

"No means yes.  Yes means anal."
"My name is Jack. I'm a necrophiliac. I fuck dead women."

"Yale University didn't wait for federal civil rights officials to determine whether the presence of the Delta Kappa Epsilon fraternity was contributing to a hostile sexual environment. The University has banned George W. Bush's old frat from the campus for five years."

"The fraternity chants that helped launch a federal investigation raise an old question: is it ever right for Yale to suppress or punish speech?"

"First Amendment advocates, however, are less than pleased. 'Whether we like what DKE did or not—and I don’t—their chants were protected speech,' says Nathaniel Zelinsky, a rising junior. 'It’s kind of an unsettling conclusion to come to, but we don’t want to make content-based decisions on speech.'"

Links:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LUEq75i_z-A
http://www.yalealumnimagazine.com/issues/2011_07/feature_freespeech.html
http://www.yalealumnimagazine.com/issues/2011_07/feature_titleix.html
http://bigthink.com/ideas/38479
http://www.drudge.com/news/144341/yale-suspends-frat-sexism

The Psychology of Online Forums

Excerpt from "The Psychology of Online Forums" by Alicia White on Yahoo's community-created content site:

"Ethnomethodology is a sociology theory that describes how people in certain situations, such as online environments, create the false impression of a collective social order when they don't understand, or perhaps don't care to understand each other fully. Inevitably, the different points of view within this forged community can lead to total anarchy if not intensely moderated by an unbiased member.


Within these online communities, notions of hierarchy are quickly established by the more seasoned posters who exhibit a rather skewed sense of importance and authority. Cliques are formed and mimic real life by picking on weaker or less popular individuals within the group.


In forums saturated with women, passion and possessiveness trumps kindness and rationality. In male-oriented groups testosterone takes over as insults fly, everyone suddenly belongs to Mensa and the discussion can turn into something along the lines of locker room bullying. Above it all, sarcasm reigns supreme, of course sarcasm doesn't easily translate online."

Gotta love a gender-line analysis in a place where nobody knows your name, let alone your DNA.

"Forums have become widely-known for their hostility and major corporations have begun to take notice. David Benady of Marketing Week points out how corporations often use forum hostility and social structure to their advantage. Benady discussed the advertising tactics of BMW marketing executives:


'They have their own blogger IDs such as Scott 26. They certainly come on forums around new model launches. They are not high-posting users, they just come on and say this is coming soon. BMW deliberately tries not to sound as intelligent as you would expect a marketer to.' [Steve] Davies argues that brands need to understand the psychology of online forums, where people crave self-esteem and status, both as individuals and for the whole community. By giving advocates exclusive pieces of information that they can then disseminate to a forum, it creates goodwill. Potential brand advocates can be identified on forums from users with the highest post counts or the ones starting the most widely read threads. But Davies says it is important the brand owner doesn't put any spin on the information it contributes to a discussion. Instead, it should simply give data and information and hope the advocates spin it themselves.'(Benady, 2007)'"

"One could say an online forum is a microcosm of society; however, a true microcosm would be comprised of unique individuals with a full range of interests and backgrounds."

"People might suffer from low self-esteem, shyness, or a physical disability that prevents them from feeling comfortable enough to socialize with others in real life. For these people forums can be greatly therapeutic and fulfilling. Some people are passive-aggressive or have other control issues and find themselves in an environment where they are free to assert their aggressive nature in full force with no repercussions. Others can be tremendously passive in real life yet anonymously they are finally given a voice in a place where their opinions mean something to a captive audience. Also present are 'trolls' that are just itching to start flame wars no matter that the topic is about and live to argue."

More psychological lingo thrown about by someone who is not trained in the field. But we all use the language now, right? Do we even know how to describe the behavior anymore without reverting to our mental pop psych library?  And what about the apparent irony or hypocrisy of people who use the language while also deriding the field?  Ever been accused of projecting or being passive-aggressive by someone who would never deign to visit one of those "quacks"?

"Class consciousness is brought into the mix by individuals who suffer from inadequacy or lack of validation and feel compelled to flaunt their real life social status, education, Mensa affiliation, employment or monetary status (whether genuine or fabricated) in an attempt to make others feel insignificant or to catapult themselves into the stratosphere of the forum's rank structure.


No matter what the individual's agenda or personality happen to be, people become intertwined in the drama of forums find it addicting and empowering to behave antisocially. One of the aggressors in a show's forum was a married mother of three who accumulated over 30,000 posts over a year and a half. That equals out to an average of 54 posts a day, seven says a week. The addiction can be very real and staying angry for that period of time can't possibly be good one's health."

Class consciousness and prejudice in a potentially "utopian" virtual world fascinates me.

"I've seen others who according to their own dialog, are online all day playing games and complain when their children are hungry or that they want attention period."

The world's new addiction...the internet. Hook up and bliss/zone/amp up and out.

"Certainly not everyone who steps foot into these forums are monsters or addicts, it's just that the monsters have a habit of taking over."

"There's a difference between healthy debating and blatant antagonizing. In an online setting where you can't see facial expressions or always sniff out witty sarcasm, people can easily misconstrue others' intended words. Next time you find yourself in a hostile thread, try to take the high ground and shrug off offending comments. Users should also try to gracefully respect comments that differ in opinion even if they are unpopular statements about highly controversial topics."

"If you are the offender, and are going off for the gratification of starting chaos or inflating your own self-esteem, perhaps seeking therapy might be in order or at least ask yourself why you harbor so much animosity towards the world. It is never okay to rationalize personal attacks with anonymity. Respect the person's rights, regardless of viewpoint. I'm just waiting for the day when someone turns around and sues a forum's host for damages caused by anxiety, high blood pressure or a heart attack. The way forums are going these days it's bound to happen sooner than later."

Noted for future reference.

"Published by Alicia White
Alicia is a former air traffic controller who lived in Japan for several years. She's currently a freelance writer in California, and a full-time pre-med student.   View profile"

"Yahoo! Contributor Network.  Contribute content like this. Start Here."

Link:
http://www.associatedcontent.com/article/504197/the_psychology_of_online_forums.html?cat=9

Amateur Hour on the Internet

Publisher's overview on Barnes & Noble of "Cult of the Amateur" by Andrew Keen:

"Amateur hour has arrived, and the audience is running the show.


In a hard-hitting and provocative polemic, Silicon Valley insider and pundit Andrew Keen exposes the grave consequences of today’s new participatory Web 2.0 and reveals how it threatens our values, economy, and ultimately the very innovation and creativity that forms the fabric of American achievement.


Our most valued cultural institutions, Keen warns—our professional newspapers, magazines, music, and movies—are being overtaken by an avalanche of amateur, user-generated free content. Advertising revenue is being siphoned off by free classified ads on sites like Craigslist; television networks are under attack from free user-generated programming on YouTube and the like; file-sharing and digital piracy have devastated the multibillion-dollar music business and threaten to undermine our movie industry. Worse, Keen claims, our “cut-and-paste” online culture—in which intellectual property is freely swapped, downloaded, remashed, and aggregated—threatens over 200 years of copyright protection and intellectual property rights, robbing artists, authors, journalists, musicians, editors, and producers of the fruits of their creative labors.


In today’s self-broadcasting culture, where amateurism is celebrated and anyone with an opinion, however ill-informed, can publish a blog, post a video on YouTube, or change an entry on Wikipedia, the distinction between trained expert and uninformed amateur becomes dangerously blurred. When anonymous bloggers and videographers, unconstrained by professional standards or editorial filters, can alter the public debate and manipulate public opinion, truth becomes a commodity to be bought, sold, packaged, and reinvented.


The very anonymity that the Web 2.0 offers calls into question the reliability of the information we receive and creates an environment in which sexual predators and identity thieves can roam free. While no Luddite—Keen pioneered several Internet startups himself—he urges us to consider the consequences of blindly supporting a culture that endorses plagiarism and piracy and that fundamentally weakens traditional media and creative institutions.

Offering concrete solutions on how we can reign in the free-wheeling, narcissistic atmosphere that pervades the Web, THE CULT OF THE AMATEUR is a wake-up call to each and every one of us."

From Barnes & Noble:

"On his blog, Andrew Keen described The Cult of the Amateur as a short, sharp murder story in which all of us are the victims. A longtime Silicon Valley insider and participant, he grew disillusioned with the Internet renaissance that he had once touted. "What the Web 2.0 revolution is really delivering," he writes, "is superficial observations of the world around us rather than deep analysis, shrill opinion rather than considered judgment." In The Cult of the Amateur, he describes how digital Darwinism is decimating the ranks of cultural gatekeepers, journalists, editors, creators, and other specialists and replacing them with the loudest and the most opinionated bloggers. In addition to its impassioned critique of phenomena such as MySpace, YouTube, and Wikipedia, Keen's book contains important insights about business, political, and social trends."

Wikipedia entry says:

"Andrew Keen (born circa 1960) is a British-American entrepreneur and author. He is particularly known for his view that the Internet and Web 2.0 may be debasing culture, an opinion he shares with Jaron Lanier and Nicholas G. Carr among others. Keen is especially concerned that the Internet undermines the authority of learned experts.

In 2006 in an essay in The Weekly Standard, Keen wrote that Web 2.0 is a "grand utopian movement" similar to "communist society" as described by Karl Marx. He stated it "worships the creative amateur: the self-taught filmmaker, the dorm-room musician, the unpublished writer. It suggests that everyone – even the most poorly educated and inarticulate amongst us – can and should use digital media to express and realize themselves. Web 2.0 'empowers' our creativity, it 'democratizes' media, it 'levels the playing field' between experts and amateurs. The enemy of Web 2.0 is 'elitist' traditional media." He describes Free Culture proponent Lawrence Lessig as an "intellectual property communist".

His book The Cult of the Amateur, was based on this essay. The book is critical of free, user-based Web sites such as Wikipedia that attempt to provide information, and was published on June 5, 2007, by Doubleday Currency. In a BBC World Service documentary on Wikipedia in 2011, Keen recommends vigilance when reading Wikipedia."

Is our internet culture a threat to our society and economy?


Links:
http://www.barnesandnoble.com/w/the-cult-of-the-amateur-andrew-keen/1012778989
http://andrewkeen.typepad.com/
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Andrew_Keen
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Cult_of_the_Amateur
http://www.nytimes.com/2007/06/29/books/29book.html
http://www.guardian.co.uk/technology/2007/jul/20/computingandthenet.books

Psi Shrinkers Roll Call

The original Psi Shrinkers were:

LeeHere Absent
Orfeu Miles
Stephie
FuckWad Occam's Barber
Mitch Wexler
Just Jordan (JJ) SCIF Princess
Queen Tsani
dadatic
LadyKatzen
TreZen
Vito
Jigs



The Asylum R&P included:

LeeHere Absent

Stephie

FuckWad Occam's Barber

Just Jordan (JJ) SCIF Princess

Chaos Factor

RedBaby Rita

dadatic

LadyKatzen

TreZen

SophieKat

Maryanne
Murasaki
Mani
Ell
Loveheart

Membership, that is to say, participation, is pretty much open to anyone who likes to get a little deeper into conversations about they way people think and behave and is open to a variety of opinions and forms of expression.  Not for yawners or the bored or disengaged.

Psi Shrinkers & Real Life Resources

News of the World, Paul McMullan, Steve Coogan and Hugh Grant

This guy McMullan is a real piece of work.  I feel sure he must be trolling on forums somewhere because I recognize both his rhetoric and his tactics.

Steve Coogan, Greg Dyke, Hugh Grant, Paul McMullan, News of the World

True Blood as Political Satire (Repost from SC MKII)

I think the killing of Gary Cole so early is part of this season's obvious and major wake up call to readers of Harris' Stackhouse series that the "True Blood" writers have taken control of the story and taken it somewhere completely different so everyone will be surprised. This season is the biggest and clearest departure from the source material yet.

I think anyone tuning in now is, unfortunately, missing out on the original cleverness, wit and political satire of season one. I admit that subsequent seasons just don't have the "bite" of the first season.

I absolutely loved the poking parallels of season one. It was almost like a game to find all the "pokes" as some were in the storyline, but some were a little more subtle, like signs on the road or posters on the wall. I freakin' loved it. The use of the vampire culture as a metaphor for minorities and gays was made new again, fresh and fun and even thought-provoking. I really wish they would infuse more of that back into the show to balance out the soapiness of it.

I'm in a Black Lit (America post 1900) class right now and I'm in another Lit class where the focus is American historical literature related to homosexuals, Communists and Socialists (also post 1900) so the comparisons are thrown into sharp relief.

There is a classmate who sits next to me in both classes who is also a fan of vampire literature in general and the Stackhouse series and "True Blood" in particular. Seems like every class we turn to each other and utter one word from the vampire lore with a knowing wink. For example, we read "Black No More" by George Shuyler and the professor was talking about "Black clubs" being popular in the 20s and 30s (Harlem Renaissance), but that these particular "Black clubs" weren't really clubs for Blacks (Blacks had their own), but rather "Black-like" clubs with Black performers creating the "Black experience" for curious Whites and Blacks who wanted to mingle with Whites. We turned to each other and said, "Fangtasia."

The scene in season one where the guy who looks like a "stereotypical" vampire freaks the college-looking kids out in the convenience store and after they leave in terror, the guy who looks like the Southern truck driver, who is an actual vamp, terrorizes the vamp-wannabe (vigger?) and tells him never to impersonate a vamp again? Priceless. There is SO much in that one scene. It's both hilarious and thesis-ready. Don't get me started! lol

Yeah, I'm a fan. Just don't call me a fangbanger. 




http://www.secondcitizen.net/Forum/showpost.php?p=379561&postcount=11